Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2019/11/18 19:20, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> [... trimming the context a bit ...]
>>
>>>>>> Take your example of TC rules: You were proposing a flow like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Userspace TC rule -> kernel rule table -> eBPF map -> generated XDP
>>>>>> program
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whereas what I mean is that we could do this instead:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Userspace TC rule -> kernel rule table
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and separately
>>>>>>
>>>>>> XDP program -> bpf helper -> lookup in kernel rule table
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, now I see what you mean.
>>>>> You expect an XDP program like this, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> int xdp_tc(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int act = bpf_xdp_tc_filter(ctx);
>>>>> return act;
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Yes, basically, except that the XDP program would need to parse the
>>>> packet first, and bpf_xdp_tc_filter() would take a parameter struct with
>>>> the parsed values. See the usage of bpf_fib_lookup() in
>>>> bpf/samples/xdp_fwd_kern.c
>>>>
>>>>> But doesn't this way lose a chance to reduce/minimize the program to
>>>>> only use necessary features for this device?
>>>>
>>>> Not necessarily. Since the BPF program does the packet parsing and fills
>>>> in the TC filter lookup data structure, it can limit what features are
>>>> used that way (e.g., if I only want to do IPv6, I just parse the v6
>>>> header, ignore TCP/UDP, and drop everything that's not IPv6). The lookup
>>>> helper could also have a flag argument to disable some of the lookup
>>>> features.
>>>
>>> It's unclear to me how to configure that.
>>> Use options when attaching the program? Something like
>>> $ xdp_tc attach eth0 --only-with ipv6
>>> But can users always determine their necessary features in advance?
>>
>> That's what I'm doing with xdp-filter now. But the answer to your second
>> question is likely to be 'probably not', so it would be good to not have
>> to do this :)
>>
>>> Frequent manual reconfiguration when TC rules frequently changes does
>>> not sound nice. Or, add hook to kernel to listen any TC filter event
>>> on some daemon and automatically reload the attached program?
>>
>> Doesn't have to be a kernel hook; we could enhance the userspace tooling
>> to do it. Say we integrate it into 'tc':
>>
>> - Add a new command 'tc xdp_accel enable <iface> --features [ipv6,etc]'
>> - When adding new rules, add the following logic:
>> - Check if XDP acceleration is enabled
>> - If it is, check whether the rule being added fits into the current
>> 'feature set' loaded on that interface.
>> - If the rule needs more features, reload the XDP program to one
>> with the needed additional features.
>> - Or, alternatively, just warn the user and let them manually
>> replace it?
>
> Ok, but there are other userspace tools to configure tc in wild.
> python and golang have their own netlink library project.
> OVS embeds TC netlink handling code in itself. There may be more tools like this.
> I think at least we should have rtnl notification about TC and monitor it
> from daemon, if we want to reload the program from userspace tools.
A daemon would be one way to do this in cases where it needs to be
completely dynamic. My guess is that there are lots of environments
where that is not required, and where a user/administrator could
realistically specify ahead of time which feature set they want to
enable XDP acceleration for. So in my mind the way to go about this is
to implement the latter first, then add dynamic reconfiguration of it on
top when (or if) it turns out to be necessary...
-Toke
