Re: [PATCH net-next v12 14/15] p4tc: add set of P4TC table kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/25/24 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
+struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_params {

Will this struct be extended in the future?

+	u32 pipeid;
+	u32 tblid;
+};
+
+struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params {
+	u32 profile_id;
+	u32 pipeid;
+	u32 tblid;
+};
+

[ ... ]

diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/p4tc.h b/include/net/tc_act/p4tc.h
index c5256d821..155068de0 100644
--- a/include/net/tc_act/p4tc.h
+++ b/include/net/tc_act/p4tc.h
@@ -13,10 +13,26 @@ struct tcf_p4act_params {
  	u32 tot_params_sz;
  };
+#define P4TC_MAX_PARAM_DATA_SIZE 124
+
+struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf {
+	u32 act_id;
+	u32 hit:1,
+	    is_default_miss_act:1,
+	    is_default_hit_act:1;
+	u8 params[P4TC_MAX_PARAM_DATA_SIZE];
+} __packed;
+
+struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_kern {
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
+	struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf act_bpf;
+};
+
  struct tcf_p4act {
  	struct tc_action common;
  	/* Params IDR reference passed during runtime */
  	struct tcf_p4act_params __rcu *params;
+	struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_kern __rcu *act_bpf;
  	u32 p_id;
  	u32 act_id;
  	struct list_head node;
@@ -24,4 +40,39 @@ struct tcf_p4act {
#define to_p4act(a) ((struct tcf_p4act *)a) +static inline struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *
+p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf(struct tc_action *action)
+{
+	struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_kern *act_bpf;
+	struct tcf_p4act *p4act = to_p4act(action);
+
+	act_bpf = rcu_dereference(p4act->act_bpf);
+
+	return &act_bpf->act_bpf;
+}
+
+static inline int
+p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_change_flags(struct tc_action *action, u32 hit,
+				      u32 dflt_miss, u32 dflt_hit)
+{
+	struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_kern *act_bpf, *act_bpf_old;
+	struct tcf_p4act *p4act = to_p4act(action);
+
+	act_bpf = kzalloc(sizeof(*act_bpf), GFP_KERNEL);


[ ... ]

+__bpf_kfunc static struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *
+bpf_p4tc_tbl_read(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,

The argument could be "struct sk_buff *skb" instead of __sk_buff. Take a look at commit 2f4643934670.

+		  struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_params *params,
+		  void *key, const u32 key__sz)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct net *caller_net;
+
+	caller_net = skb->dev ? dev_net(skb->dev) : sock_net(skb->sk);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_tbl_read(caller_net, params, key, key__sz);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *
+xdp_p4tc_tbl_read(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx,
+		  struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_params *params,
+		  void *key, const u32 key__sz)
+{
+	struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx;
+	struct net *caller_net;
+
+	caller_net = dev_net(ctx->rxq->dev);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_tbl_read(caller_net, params, key, key__sz);
+}
+
+static int
+__bpf_p4tc_entry_create(struct net *net,
+			struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+			void *key, const u32 key__sz,
+			struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *act_bpf)
+{
+	struct p4tc_table_entry_key *entry_key = key;
+	struct p4tc_pipeline *pipeline;
+	struct p4tc_table *table;
+
+	if (!params || !key)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (key__sz != P4TC_ENTRY_KEY_SZ_BYTES(entry_key->keysz))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pipeline = p4tc_pipeline_find_byid(net, params->pipeid);
+	if (!pipeline)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	table = p4tc_tbl_cache_lookup(net, params->pipeid, params->tblid);
+	if (!table)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	if (entry_key->keysz != table->tbl_keysz)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf(pipeline, table, entry_key, act_bpf,
+					   params->profile_id);

My understanding is this kfunc will allocate a "struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf_kern" object. If the bpf_p4tc_entry_delete() kfunc is never called and the bpf prog is unloaded, how the act_bpf object will be cleaned up?

+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+bpf_p4tc_entry_create(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+		      void *key, const u32 key__sz,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *act_bpf)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = skb->dev ? dev_net(skb->dev) : sock_net(skb->sk);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_create(net, params, key, key__sz, act_bpf);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+xdp_p4tc_entry_create(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+		      void *key, const u32 key__sz,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *act_bpf)
+{
+	struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = dev_net(ctx->rxq->dev);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_create(net, params, key, key__sz, act_bpf);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+bpf_p4tc_entry_create_on_miss(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
+			      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+			      void *key, const u32 key__sz,
+			      struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *act_bpf)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = skb->dev ? dev_net(skb->dev) : sock_net(skb->sk);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_create(net, params, key, key__sz, act_bpf);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+xdp_p4tc_entry_create_on_miss(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx,

Same here. "struct xdp_buff *xdp".

+			      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+			      void *key, const u32 key__sz,
+			      struct p4tc_table_entry_act_bpf *act_bpf)
+{
+	struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = dev_net(ctx->rxq->dev);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_create(net, params, key, key__sz, act_bpf);
+}
+

[ ... ]

+__bpf_kfunc static int
+bpf_p4tc_entry_delete(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+		      void *key, const u32 key__sz)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = skb->dev ? dev_net(skb->dev) : sock_net(skb->sk);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_delete(net, params, key, key__sz);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+xdp_p4tc_entry_delete(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx,
+		      struct p4tc_table_entry_create_bpf_params *params,
+		      void *key, const u32 key__sz)
+{
+	struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx;
+	struct net *net;
+
+	net = dev_net(ctx->rxq->dev);
+
+	return __bpf_p4tc_entry_delete(net, params, key, key__sz);
+}
+
+BTF_SET8_START(p4tc_kfunc_check_tbl_set_skb)

This soon will be broken with the latest change in bpf-next. It is replaced by BTF_KFUNCS_START. commit a05e90427ef6.

What is the plan on the selftest ?

+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_p4tc_tbl_read, KF_RET_NULL);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_p4tc_entry_create);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_p4tc_entry_create_on_miss);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_p4tc_entry_update);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_p4tc_entry_delete);
+BTF_SET8_END(p4tc_kfunc_check_tbl_set_skb)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set p4tc_kfunc_tbl_set_skb = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set = &p4tc_kfunc_check_tbl_set_skb,
+};
+
+BTF_SET8_START(p4tc_kfunc_check_tbl_set_xdp)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, xdp_p4tc_tbl_read, KF_RET_NULL);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, xdp_p4tc_entry_create);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, xdp_p4tc_entry_create_on_miss);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, xdp_p4tc_entry_update);
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, xdp_p4tc_entry_delete);
+BTF_SET8_END(p4tc_kfunc_check_tbl_set_xdp)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux