On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:46 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Check that bpf_map__set_autocreate() can be used to disable automatic
> creation for struct_ops maps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c | 42 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b21b10f94fc2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include "struct_ops_autocreate.skel.h"
> +
> +#define EXPECTED_MSG "libbpf: struct_ops init_kern"
> +
> +static libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_cb;
> +static bool msg_found;
> +
> +static int print_cb(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> + old_print_cb(level, fmt, args);
> + if (level == LIBBPF_WARN && strncmp(fmt, EXPECTED_MSG, strlen(EXPECTED_MSG)) == 0)
> + msg_found = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cant_load_full_object(void)
> +{
> + struct struct_ops_autocreate *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + old_print_cb = libbpf_set_print(print_cb);
> + skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open_and_load();
> + err = errno;
> + libbpf_set_print(old_print_cb);
> + if (!ASSERT_NULL(skel, "struct_ops_autocreate__open_and_load"))
> + return;
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(err, ENOTSUP, "errno should be ENOTSUP");
> + ASSERT_TRUE(msg_found, "expected message");
> +
> + struct_ops_autocreate__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +static void can_load_partial_object(void)
> +{
> + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
nit: prefer LIBBPF_OPTS() over DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS()
> + struct struct_ops_autocreate *skel;
> + struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts(&opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_autocreate__open_opts"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_2, false);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_autoload"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + err = bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.testmod_2, false);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_autocreate"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + err = struct_ops_autocreate__load(skel);
> + if (ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_autocreate__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* test_1() would be called from bpf_dummy_reg2() in bpf_testmod.c */
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_1_result, 42, "test_1_result");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> + struct_ops_autocreate__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +void serial_test_struct_ops_autocreate(void)
same as in the previous patch, why serial?
> +{
> + if (test__start_subtest("cant_load_full_object"))
> + cant_load_full_object();
> + if (test__start_subtest("can_load_partial_object"))
> + can_load_partial_object();
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..294d48bb8e3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +int test_1_result = 0;
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
> +int BPF_PROG(test_1)
> +{
> + test_1_result = 42;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
> +int BPF_PROG(test_2)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 {
> + int (*test_1)(void);
> +};
> +
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
> + int (*test_1)(void);
> + int (*does_not_exist)(void);
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 testmod_1 = {
> + .test_1 = (void *)test_1
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
can you please also have a test where we use SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
which set autoload to false by default?
> +struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = {
> + .test_1 = (void *)test_1,
> + .does_not_exist = (void *)test_2
> +};
> --
> 2.43.0
>
