Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing to array bpf map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/21/19 1:14 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing it!
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:43 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/19/19 11:30 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>>> Tested bpf_map_lookup_batch() and bpf_map_update_batch()
>>> functionality.
>>>
>>>     $ ./test_maps
>>>         ...
>>>           test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch_array:PASS
>>>         ...
>>
>> The test is for lookup_batch() and update_batch()
>> and the test name and func name is lookup_and_delete_batch(),
>> probably rename is to lookup_and_update_batch_array()?
>>
> Yes, you are right, I will change the name for next version.
> 
>> It would be good if generic lookup_and_delete_batch()
>> and delete_patch() can be tested as well.
>> Maybe tried to use prog_array?
> 
>   I did test generic_lookup_and_delete_batch with hmap and it worked
> fine because I didn't have concurrent deletions.
> But yes I will add tests for generic delete and lookup_and_delete,
> maybe for the trie map (prog_array doesn't support lookup ang hence
> lookup_and_delete won't apply there)?

trie_map is a good choice. Basically any map which can be used to test
this API.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux