Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: specify which BPF_ABS and BPF_IND fields were zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:54:19 -0800 you wrote:
> Specifying which fields were unused allows IANA to only list as deprecated
> instructions that were actually used, leaving the rest as unassigned and
> possibly available for future use for something else.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf, docs: specify which BPF_ABS and BPF_IND fields were zero
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/89ee838130f4

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux