On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 09:39 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 2/19/24 7:52 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Now that we have a system-wide page pool, we can use that for the live > > > frame mode of BPF_TEST_RUN (used by the XDP traffic generator), and > > > avoid the cost of creating a separate page pool instance for each > > > syscall invocation. See the individual patches for more details. > > > > > > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (3): > > > net: Register system page pool as an XDP memory model > > > bpf: test_run: Use system page pool for XDP live frame mode > > > bpf: test_run: Fix cacheline alignment of live XDP frame data > > > structures > > > > > > include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 + > > > net/bpf/test_run.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > > net/core/dev.c | 13 +++- > > > 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) > > > > Hi maintainers > > > > This series is targeting net-next, but it's listed as delegate:bpf in > > patchwork[0]; is that a mistake? Do I need to do anything more to nudge it > > along? > > I moved it over to netdev, it would be good next time if there are dependencies > which are in net-next but not yet bpf-next to clearly state them given from this > series the majority touches the bpf test infra code. This series apparently causes bpf self-tests failures: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/7929088890/job/21648828278 I'm unsure if that is blocking, or just a CI glitch. The series LGTM, but I think it would be better if someone from the ebpf team could also have a look. Thanks! Paolo
