On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 11:55 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > set_memory_rox() can fail, leaving memory unprotected. > > Check return and bail out when bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() returns > and error. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Previous patch introduces a dependency on this patch because it > modifies bpf_prog_lock_ro(), but they are independant. > It is possible to apply this patch as standalone by handling trivial > conflict with unmodified bpf_prog_lock_ro(). > --- > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ++- > arch/parisc/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 8 +++++++- > arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++- > arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 6 +++++- > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 3 +-- > include/linux/filter.h | 4 ++-- > 9 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # s390x
