Hi Steve, On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 11:53:28 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:51:08 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > @@ -798,10 +798,6 @@ ftrace_pop_return_trace(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, unsigned long *ret, > > > > > > > > *index += FGRAPH_RET_INDEX; > > > > *ret = ret_stack->ret; > > > > - trace->func = ret_stack->func; > > > > - trace->calltime = ret_stack->calltime; > > > > - trace->overrun = atomic_read(¤t->trace_overrun); > > > > - trace->depth = current->curr_ret_depth; > > > > > > There's a lot of information stored in the trace structure. Why not pass > > > that to the new retregfunc? > > > > > > Then you don't need to separate this code out. > > > > Sorry, I couldn't catch what you meant, Would you mean to call > > ftrace_pop_return_trace() before calling retregfunc()?? because some of the > > information are found from ret_stack, which is poped from shadow stack. > > Ah, sorry I got what you said. I think this `trace` is not usable for the new > interface. Most of the information is only used for the function-graph tracer. > For example, trace->calltime and trace->overrun, trace->depth are used only > for the function-graph tracer, but not for the other tracers. > > But yeah, this idea is considerable. It also allows us to just update > entryfunc() and retfunc() to pass fgraph_regs and return address. The reason why I didn't use the those for *regfunc() is not only those have unused information, but those does not have some params. - ftrace_graph_ent only have current `func`, but entryregfunc() needs `parent_ip` (== return address) - ftrace_graph_ret only have current `func`, but retregfunc() needs `ret` (== return address) too. If I update the ftrace_graph_ent/ret to add 'retaddr', we can just pass ftrace_graph_ent/ret, ftrace_regs, and fgraph_ops to *regfunc(). Moreover, maybe we don't need *regfunc, but just update entryfunc/retfunc to pass ftrace_regs *, which will be NULL if it is not supported. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>