On Sat, 2024-02-17 at 20:19 +0200, Eduard Zingerman wrote: [...] > > Also, shouldn't this go into bpf tree instead of bpf-next? > > Will re-send v3 with fixes tag to 'bpf' Sending via 'bpf' tree would require dropping patch #1. The test_tcp_custom_syncookie is not yet in 'bpf'. Note that patch #2 breaks syncookie test w/o patch #1. Should I split this in two parts? - patch #1 - send via bpf-next - patch #2,3 - send via bpf
