Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix an issue in bpf_iter_task

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 19:41:50 +0800 you wrote:
> The uninitialized bpf_iter_task variable poses a risk of triggering a
> kernel panic. To fix this potential issue, it's imperative to ensure proper
> initialization of the variable. This problem surfaced during the
> implementation phase of the bits iterator [0].
> 
> [0]. https://lwn.net/ml/bpf/CALOAHbDJWHOB+viBz6SUqdeF+Nkxmh4gLZo5Ad_keQXjBWHAsQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Fix an issue due to uninitialized bpf_iter_task
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/5f2ae606cb5a
  - [v2,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add negtive test cases for task iter
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/5c138a8a4abe

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux