On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 10:12 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, and then special case, for KPROBE that `struct
> bpf_user_pt_regs_t` (not a typedef!) is also acceptable.
Hm, I missed the point that for kporbes there is a need to accept both
simultaneously (for the same running kernel):
typedef __whatever__ bpf_user_pt_regs_t;
struct bpf_user_pt_regs_t {};
If this is the only such case, then I agree that special case is
simplest to implement.
