On 2/12/24 1:28 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
+BPF_CALL 0x8 0x1 call PC += reg_val(imm) BPF_JMP | BPF_X only, see `Program-local functions`_If the instruction requires a register operand, why not using one of the register fields? Is there any reason for not doing that?
Talked to Alexei and we think using dst_reg for the register for callx insn is better. I will craft a llvm patch for this today. Thanks!
