On 02/09, Oliver Crumrine wrote: > Originally, this patch removed a redundant check in > BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS, as the check was already being done in > the function it called, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. For v2, it was > reccomended that I remove the check from __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb, > and add the checks to the other macro that calls that function, > BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS. > > To sum it up, checking that the socket exists and that it is a full > socket is now part of both macros BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS and > BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS, and it is no longer part of the > function they call, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@xxxxxxxxx> > > v1->v2: Addressed feedback about where check should be removed. Can you please repost with [PATCH bpf-next] subj? I think bot is having problem applying your changes otherwise..
