On 02/08, Hari Bathini wrote: > Compiling with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL & !CONFIG_BPF_JIT throws the below > warning: > > "WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_cpumask" > > Fix it by adding the appropriate #ifdef. Can you explain a bit more on why CONFIG_BPF_JIT is appropriate here? kernel/bpf/cpumask.c seems to be gated by CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. So presumably all those symbols should be still compiled in with !CONFIG_BPF_JIT?