On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 14:08, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Do not report the XDP capability NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY as the
> > bonding driver does not support XDP and AF_XDP in zero-copy mode even
> > if the real NIC drivers do.
> >
> > Fixes: cb9e6e584d58 ("bonding: add xdp_features support")
> > Reported-by: Prashant Batra <prbatra.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJ8uoz2ieZCopgqTvQ9ZY6xQgTbujmC6XkMTamhp68O-h_-rLg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
> > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > index 4e0600c7b050..79a37bed097b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -1819,6 +1819,8 @@ void bond_xdp_set_features(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> > bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter)
> > val &= slave->dev->xdp_features;
> >
> > + val &= ~NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY;
> > +
> > xdp_set_features_flag(bond_dev, val);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -5910,8 +5912,10 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> > bond_dev->features |= BOND_XFRM_FEATURES;
> > #endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
> >
> > - if (bond_xdp_check(bond))
> > + if (bond_xdp_check(bond)) {
> > bond_dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_MASK;
> > + bond_dev->xdp_features &= ~NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY;
> > + }
>
> Shouldn't we rather drop this assignment completely? It makes no sense
> to default to all features, it should default to none...
Good point. Seems the bond device defaults to supporting everything
before a device is bonded to it, but I might have misunderstood
something. Lorenzo, could you enlighten us please?
Thanks: Magnus
> -Toke
>
