On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:11 AM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/3/24 11:56 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > 'config BPF' exists in both init/Kconfig and kernel/bpf/Kconfig.
> >
> > Commit b24abcff918a ("bpf, kconfig: Add consolidated menu entry for bpf
> > with core options") added the second one to kernel/bpf/Kconfig instead
> > of moving the existing one.
> >
> > Merge them together.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > init/Kconfig | 5 -----
> > kernel/bpf/Kconfig | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index 8d4e836e1b6b..46ccad83a664 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -1457,11 +1457,6 @@ config SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW
> > config HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM
> > bool
> >
> > -# interpreter that classic socket filters depend on
> > -config BPF
> > - bool
> > - select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA1
> > -
> > menuconfig EXPERT
> > bool "Configure standard kernel features (expert users)"
> > # Unhide debug options, to make the on-by-default options visible
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> > index 6a906ff93006..bc25f5098a25 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/Kconfig
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > # BPF interpreter that, for example, classic socket filters depend on.
> > config BPF
> > bool
> > + select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA1
>
> Currently, the kernel/bpf directory is guarded with CONFIG_BPF
> obj-$(CONFIG_BPF) += bpf/
> in kernel/bpf/Makefile.
Wrong.
"in kernel/Makefile".
Why is it related to this patch?
> Your patch probably works since there are lots of some other BPF related
> configurations which requires CONFIG_BPF. But maybe we sould
> keep 'config BPF' in init/Kconfig and remove 'config BPF'
> in kernel/bpf/Kconfig. This will be less confusing?
Why?
> >
> > # Used by archs to tell that they support BPF JIT compiler plus which
> > # flavour. Only one of the two can be selected for a specific arch since
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
