Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: Fix error checking for cpumask_success__load()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:57 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We should verify the return value of cpumask_success__load().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>



>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> index c2e886399e3c..ecf89df78109 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name)
>         struct bpf_program *prog;
>         struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
>         pid_t child_pid;
> -       int status;
> +       int status, err;
>
>         skel = cpumask_success__open();
>         if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "cpumask_success__open"))
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name)
>         skel->bss->pid = getpid();
>         skel->bss->nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
>
> -       cpumask_success__load(skel);
> -       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "cpumask_success__load"))
> +       err = cpumask_success__load(skel);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "cpumask_success__load"))
>                 goto cleanup;
>
>         prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
> --
> 2.39.1
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux