Hi all, On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:02:28 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > > index 0fe4f1cd1918..e24aabfe8ecc 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h > > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h > > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ BTF_SET8_END(name) > > #define BTF_SET_END(name) > > #define BTF_SET8_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { 0 }; > > #define BTF_SET8_END(name) > > -#define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { 0 }; > > +#define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS }; > > #define BTF_KFUNCS_END(name) > > Most likely you're correct. > Force pushed bpf-next with this fix. That fixed it for me, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpqNaWjTy9uV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature