[PATCH bpf-next 3/5] libbpf: add btf__new_split() API that was declared but not implemented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seems like original commit adding split BTF support intended to add
btf__new_split() API, and even declared it in libbpf.map, but never
added (trivial) implementation. Fix this.

Fixes: ba451366bf44 ("libbpf: Implement basic split BTF support")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/btf.c      | 5 +++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index 95db88b36cf3..845034d15420 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -1079,6 +1079,11 @@ struct btf *btf__new(const void *data, __u32 size)
 	return libbpf_ptr(btf_new(data, size, NULL));
 }
 
+struct btf *btf__new_split(const void *data, __u32 size, struct btf *base_btf)
+{
+	return libbpf_ptr(btf_new(data, size, base_btf));
+}
+
 static struct btf *btf_parse_elf(const char *path, struct btf *base_btf,
 				 struct btf_ext **btf_ext)
 {
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index d9e1f57534fa..386964f572a8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ LIBBPF_0.3.0 {
 		btf__parse_raw_split;
 		btf__parse_split;
 		btf__new_empty_split;
-		btf__new_split;
 		ring_buffer__epoll_fd;
 } LIBBPF_0.2.0;
 
@@ -411,5 +410,7 @@ LIBBPF_1.3.0 {
 } LIBBPF_1.2.0;
 
 LIBBPF_1.4.0 {
+	global:
 		bpf_token_create;
+		btf__new_split;
 } LIBBPF_1.3.0;
-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux