Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:00:50 -0800 you wrote:
> Clarify definitions of several instructions:
> * BPF_NEG does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_CALL does not support BPF_JMP32 or BPF_X
> * BPF_EXIT does not support BPF_X
> * BPF_JA does not support BPF_X (was implied but not explicitly stated)
> 
> Also fix a typo in the wide instruction figure where
> the field is actually named "opcode" not "code".
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf, docs: Clarify definitions of various instructions
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e48f0f4a9bfe

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux