Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:53:28 +0200
Cc: kernel-team@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <781173a0f5e6eb383b03fc85dab3927ae88c52a5.camel@gmail.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.50.3

On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 21:49 +0200, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
[...]
> 
> I've read through patch-set and it seem to be ok,
> checks match behavior described in patch #3 description.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>

Oh, well, I missed v3.
Never-mind then, sorry for the noise.

References:
- [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement
  - From: Eduard Zingerman

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 5/5] libbpf: warn on unexpected __arg_ctx type when rewriting BTF
Next by Date: Re: lsm_cgroup.c selftest fails to compile when CONFIG_PACKET!=y
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] Tighten up arg:ctx type enforcement
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v16 00/14] Registrating struct_ops types from modules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux