On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:51:18 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > I do agree that conceptually it makes a lot of sense to encapsulate the > budget like this so drivers don't have to do all this state tracking > themselves. It does appear that drivers are doing different things with > the budget as it is today, though. For instance, the intel drivers seem > to divide the budget over all the enabled RX rings(?); so I'm wondering > if it'll be possible to unify drivers around a more opaque NAPI poll API? We can come up with APIs which would cater to multi-queue cases. Bigger question is what is the sensible polling strategy for those, just dividing the budget seems, hm, crude.