On 1/16/2024 12:50 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there > exist 6 failed tests. > > [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable > [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled > [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL > #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL > #107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL > #108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL > #109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL > #110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL > #111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL > Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED > > The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs, > interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped > if jit is disabled, copy some check functions from the other places under > tools directory, and then handle this case in do_test_single(). > > With this patch: > > [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable > [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled > [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL > Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED > > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
