Hi Jiri, Thanks for reviewing! On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:14:25PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote: > > are .BTF_ids records guaranteed to be sorted by address? so we are > sure that the set will be followed by its records? I think so, unless I am misunderstanding something. The asm directives are basically laying out the btf_id_set8 datastructures by hand. So if the entries don't adhere to the exact layout then lots more will break right? > > I thought we'd need to find size for each set and then check each > .BTF_ids record if it belongs to the set Not sure I'm following. How would the check be done differently than in the patch? Thanks, Daniel
