* Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, so: > > > > - I took this older series and updated it to current upstream, and made > > sure all renames were fully done: there were two new Kconfig option > > uses, which I integrated into the series. (Sorry about the delay, holiday & stuff.) > > > > - I also widened the renames to comments and messages, which were not > > always covered. > > > > - Then I took this cover letter and combined it with a more high level > > description of the reasoning behind this series I wrote up, and added it > > to patch #1. (see it below.) > > > > - Then I removed the changelog repetition from the other patches and just > > referred them back to patch #1. > > > > - Then I stuck the resulting updated series into tip:x86/bugs, without the > > last 3 patches that modify behavior. > > Thanks for your work. I am currently reviwing the tip branch and the > merge seems go so far. > > Regarding the last 3 patches, what are the next steps? Please resubmit them in a few days (with Josh's Acked-by added and any fixes/enhancements done along the way), on top of tip:x86/bugs. Thanks, Ingo
