Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:23:26 -0800
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <41187e00-7644-4974-90c8-cd8c499b7f9e@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 6:56 AM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > but it is a must to have a better commit message here.
> >
>
> I'll write a better commit message here.

Please respin with updated commit messages and drop RFC tag.
Keep Reviewed-by that you received already.

References:
- [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Leon Hwang
- [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Leon Hwang
- Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Maciej Fijalkowski
- Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Leon Hwang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Introduce "volatile compare" macros
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: Allow per unit prefill for non-fix-size percpu memory allocator
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
Next by thread: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] bpf, x64: Load tail_call_cnt pointer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]