Re: [PATCH bpf-next v12 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursive attachment of tracing progs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 12:47:44PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:19 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:47:14AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:06 AM Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Dummy fentry bpf prog for testing fentry attachment chains. It's going to be
> > > > + * a start of the chain.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > Comment  style. I guess we don't need to respin the set just for this.
> >
> > Damn, I thought I've corrected them all, sorry.
> >
> > What do you mean by not needing to respin the set, are you suggesting
> > leaving it like this, or to change it without bumping the patch set
> > number?
>
> I meant let's not send v13 yet. If this is the only fix we need, the maintainer
> can probably fix it when applying the patches.

Sounds reasonable, thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux