On 1/3/24 14:51, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
I'm curious how bpf_cmp_likely/bpf_cmp_unlikely (just applied to bpf-next) compares to this?
these work great! e.g. if (bpf_cmp_likely(idx, <, NR_MAP_ELEMS)) map_elems[idx] = i;works fine. since that's essentially the code that bpf_array_elem() was trying to replace, i'd rather just use the new bpf_cmp helpers than have the special array_elem helpers.
thanks, barret