Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use nla_ok() instead of checking nla_len directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:19:04 -0800 you wrote:
> nla_len may also be too short to be sane, in which case after
> recent changes nla_len() will return a wrapped value.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+f43a23b6e622797c7a28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 172db56d90d2 ("netlink: Return unsigned value for nla_len()")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: use nla_ok() instead of checking nla_len directly
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2130c519a401

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux