Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/4] bpf: Relax tracing prog recursive attach rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 07:49:08PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:30:24PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > +	/* Bookkeeping for managing the prog attachment chain */
> > > +	if (tgt_prog &&
> > > +		prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
> > > +		tgt_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING)
> > > +		prog->aux->attach_tracing_prog = true;
> >
> > wrong indentation in here, please check the if conditions around
> 
> I'm a bit confused here, why is the indentation here wrong? IIUC "if"
> predicates have to be aligned on the same column, with padding where
> needed. Or is it always necessary to expand the last tab with spaces?

I meant it should have looked something like this:

	if (tgt_prog &&
	    prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
	    tgt_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING)
		prog->aux->attach_tracing_prog = true;

jirka




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux