On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:31 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:39:25PM -0800, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Tiny nits below in case you respin this for other reasons:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This commit extends test_tunnel selftest to test the new XDP xfrm state
> > > lookup kfunc.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c | 20 ++++++--
> > > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> > > index 2d7f8fa82ebd..fc804095d578 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> > > @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
> > > "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> > > - "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
> > > + "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
> > > "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
> > > IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
> > > "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> > > - "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
> > > + "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
> >
> > nit: why do you need to set the replay-window in both directions?
>
> No reason - probably just careless here.
>
> >
> > > "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
> > > IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > */
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> > > - "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
> > > + "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
> > > "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
> > > IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > /* root -> at_ns0 */
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> > > - "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
> > > + "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
> > > "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
> > > IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
> > > SYS(fail,
> > > @@ -628,8 +628,10 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > {
> > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, tc_hook,
> > > .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
> > > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_attach_opts, opts);
> > > struct test_tunnel_kern *skel = NULL;
> > > struct nstoken *nstoken;
> > > + int xdp_prog_fd;
> > > int tc_prog_fd;
> > > int ifindex;
> > > int err;
> > > @@ -654,6 +656,14 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > if (attach_tc_prog(&tc_hook, tc_prog_fd, -1))
> > > goto done;
> > >
> > > + /* attach xdp prog to tunnel dev */
> > > + xdp_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xfrm_get_state_xdp);
> > > + if (!ASSERT_GE(xdp_prog_fd, 0, "bpf_program__fd"))
> > > + goto done;
> > > + err = bpf_xdp_attach(ifindex, xdp_prog_fd, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
> > > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_xdp_attach"))
> > > + goto done;
> > > +
> > > /* ping from at_ns0 namespace test */
> > > nstoken = open_netns("at_ns0");
> > > err = test_ping(AF_INET, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
> > > @@ -667,6 +677,8 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
> > > goto done;
> > > if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_remote_ip, 0xac100164, "remote_ip"))
> > > goto done;
> > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_replay_window, 42, "replay_window"))
> > > + goto done;
> > >
> > > done:
> > > delete_xfrm_tunnel();
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> > > index 3a59eb9c34de..c0dd38616562 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ int bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
> > > struct bpf_fou_encap *encap, int type) __ksym;
> > > int bpf_skb_get_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
> > > struct bpf_fou_encap *encap) __ksym;
> > > +struct xfrm_state *
> > > +bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state(struct xdp_md *ctx, struct bpf_xfrm_state_opts *opts,
> > > + u32 opts__sz) __ksym;
> > > +void bpf_xdp_xfrm_state_release(struct xfrm_state *x) __ksym;
> > >
> > > struct {
> > > __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> > > @@ -950,4 +954,51 @@ int xfrm_get_state(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> > > return TC_ACT_OK;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +volatile int xfrm_replay_window = 0;
> > > +
> > > +SEC("xdp")
> > > +int xfrm_get_state_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct bpf_xfrm_state_opts opts = {};
> > > + struct xfrm_state *x = NULL;
> > > + struct ip_esp_hdr *esph;
> > > + struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> > > + u8 esph_buf[8] = {};
> > > + u8 iph_buf[20] = {};
> > > + struct iphdr *iph;
> > > + u32 off;
> > > +
> > > + if (bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(xdp, 0, &ptr))
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + off = sizeof(struct ethhdr);
> > > + iph = bpf_dynptr_slice(&ptr, off, iph_buf, sizeof(iph_buf));
> > > + if (!iph || iph->protocol != IPPROTO_ESP)
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + off += sizeof(struct iphdr);
> > > + esph = bpf_dynptr_slice(&ptr, off, esph_buf, sizeof(esph_buf));
> > > + if (!esph)
> > > + goto out;
> > > +
> > > + opts.netns_id = BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS;
> > > + opts.daddr.a4 = iph->daddr;
> > > + opts.spi = esph->spi;
> > > + opts.proto = IPPROTO_ESP;
> > > + opts.family = AF_INET;
> > > +
> > > + x = bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state(xdp, &opts, sizeof(opts));
> > > + if (!x || opts.error)
> >
> > nit: how can opts.error be non zero if x == NULL?
>
> Ignoring the new -ENOENT case, it can't. Which is why I'm testing that
> behavior here.
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
AFAICT, regardless of the -ENOENT change, I don't see
how (!x) is false and (opt.error) is true, and so
"if (!x || opts.error)" is always equivalent to "if (!x)".
What am I missing?
Eyal.
