Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix timer/test_bad_ret subtest on test_progs-cpuv4 flavor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:30:28 -0800 you wrote:
> Because test_bad_ret main program is not written in assembly, we don't
> control instruction indices in timer_cb_ret_bad() subprog. This bites us
> in timer/test_bad_ret subtest, where we see difference between cpuv4 and
> other flavors.
> 
> For now, make __msg() expectations not rely on instruction indices by
> anchoring them around bpf_get_prandom_u32 call. Once we have regex/glob
> support for __msg(), this can be expressed a bit more nicely, but for
> now just mitigating the problem with available means.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix timer/test_bad_ret subtest on test_progs-cpuv4 flavor
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1720c42b90c8

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux