On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 12:55:16PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:46 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:36 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:20:37PM +0100, KP Singh wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > --- > > > > security/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > > > Did something go missing from this patch? I don't see anything depending > > > on CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY (I think this was working in v7, though?) > > I guess while I'm at it, and for the sake of the mailing list, it is > worth mentioning that I voiced my dislike of the > CONFIG_SECURITY_HOOK_LIKELY Kconfig option earlier this year yet it > continues to appear in the patchset. It's hard to give something > priority when I do provide some feedback and it is apparently ignored. The CONFIG was created specifically to address earlier concerns about not being able to choose whether to use this performance improvement. :P What's the right direction forward? -- Kees Cook
