Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 20:39:37 -0800
Cc: ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231207210843.168466-3-void@manifault.com>


On 12/7/23 1:08 PM, David Vernet wrote:

The new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc can be used to count the number of
bits that are set in a struct cpumask* kptr. Let's add a selftest to
verify its behavior.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
  - From: David Vernet
- [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
  - From: David Vernet

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
Next by Date: Re: BPF LSM prevent program unload
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux