Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 13:57:21 -0800
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@xxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20231208084758.67fbd198@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 1:48 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
>   ec32ca301faa ("bpf: Add verifier regression test for previous patch")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

My bad for not noticing this, I'll fix it and force-push, sorry.

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

References:
- linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: Re: [Bpf] BPF ISA conformance groups
Next by Date: [bug report] until recently, code for bpf_loop callbacks using stack for ctx was mangled by verifier
Previous by thread: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree
Next by thread: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bpf-next tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux