linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the bpf-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/security.h

between commit:

  d734ca7b33db ("bpf,lsm: add BPF token LSM hooks")

from the bpf-next tree and commit:

  e1ca7129db2c ("LSM: Helpers for attribute names and filling lsm_ctx")

from the security tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/security.h
index 00809d2d5c38,750130a7b9dd..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@@ -32,7 -32,7 +32,8 @@@
  #include <linux/string.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/sockptr.h>
 +#include <linux/bpf.h>
+ #include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
  
  struct linux_binprm;
  struct cred;

Attachment: pgpOn8HBEMazc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux