On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:57 AM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *
> @@ -901,6 +931,8 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
> BPF_ITER_CREATE,
> BPF_LINK_DETACH,
> BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP,
> + BPF_TOKEN_CREATE,
> + __MAX_BPF_CMD,
> };
Not an issue with this commit. I just noticed that
commit f2e10bff16a0 ("bpf: Add support for BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD for bpf_link")
added MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE to enum bpf_link_type.
While this commit is correctly adding __MAX_BPF_CMD that
is consistent with old __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE (added in 2016)
and __MAX_BPF_REG (added in 2014).
I think it would be good to follow up with adding two underscores
to MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE just to keep things consistent in bpf.h.
