On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:49 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 10:30 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > [...] > > > 'type != SCALAR_VALUE' makes sense as well. > > > Do you plan to add this check as a part of current patch? > > > > nope :) this will turn into another retval patch set story. Feel free > > to follow up if you care enough about this, though! > > Well, it's a regression. On the other hand at my old job we considered technically, but it was never meant to work, which is why I'm ok with fixing it by tightening the check > that feature does not exist if it's not covered by a test. > I'll do a follow-up. thanks!
