x86's implementation of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() requires BPF_INSN_SAFETY buffer space between end of program and image_end. OTOH, the return value does not include BPF_INSN_SAFETY. This doesn't cause any real issue at the moment. However, "image" of size retval is not enough for arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). This will cause confusion when we introduce a new helper arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). To avoid future confusion, adjust the return value to include BPF_INSN_SAFETY. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 8c10d9abc239..5f7528cac344 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i ret = -EFAULT; goto cleanup; } - ret = prog - (u8 *)image; + ret = prog - (u8 *)image + BPF_INSN_SAFETY; cleanup: kfree(branches); -- 2.34.1
