Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: bring back removal of dev-bound id from idr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:40 AM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/22/23 10:05 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>> Commit ef01f4e25c17 ("bpf: restore the ebpf program ID for BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD
> >>>> and PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD") stopped removing program's id from
> >>>> idr when the offloaded/bound netdev goes away. I was supposed to
> >>>> take a look and check in [0], but apparently I did not.
> >>>>
> >>>> The purpose of idr removal is to avoid BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID returning
> >>>> stale ids for the programs that have a dead netdev. This functionality
> >>>
> >>> What may be wrong if BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID returns the id?
> >>> e.g. If the prog is pinned somewhere, it may be useful to know a prog is still loaded in the system.
> >
> > bpftool is a bit spooked by those prog ids currently: calling GET_INFO_BY_ID
> > on those programs returns ENODEV. So we can keep those ids around, but
> > need some tweaks on the bpftool in this case. LMK if any of you prefer
> > this option.
>
> I think it is in general useful to improve 'bpftool prog show' to keep going for
> the next prog id if possible. May be print an error message after the prog id
> and then keep going for the next prog id?

Replied with a v2 where I mark those progs as 'orphaned'!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux