Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] selftests/bpf: Update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_ macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:33:14 +0530 you wrote:
> Multiple files/programs in `tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/` still
> heavily use the `CHECK` macro, even when better `ASSERT_` alternatives are
> available.
> 
> As it was already pointed out by Yonghong Song [1] in the bpf selftests the use
> of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3,1/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b0e2a0395312
  - [bpf-next,v3,2/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ec1114a9745
  - [bpf-next,v3,3/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f125d09b99fc
  - [bpf-next,v3,4/4] selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in vmlinux
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ece0e85f679

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux