Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 9/9] bpftool: Add Makefile to facilitate bpftool_tests usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2023-11-16 19:43 UTC+0000 ~ Manu Bretelle <chantr4@xxxxxxxxx>
> Provide some Makefile targets to run the linter, build the tests, and
> run them on the host or in a VM.
> 
>     $ make vmtest
>     cargo test --no-run --offline
>         Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.05s
>       Executable unittests src/main.rs
>     (target/debug/deps/bpftool_tests-afa5a7eef3cdeafb)
>     vmtest -k /data/users/chantra/bpf-next/arch/x86/boot/bzImage
>     "RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 BPFTOOL_PATH=../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool cargo
>     test"
>     => bzImage
>     ===> Booting
>     ===> Setting up VM
>     ===> Running command
>         Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 2.05s
>          Running unittests src/main.rs
>     (target/debug/deps/bpftool_tests-afa5a7eef3cdeafb)
> 
>     running 11 tests
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_dump_id ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_list ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_pids ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_list ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_pids ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_show_id ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_id ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_name ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_dump_name ... ok
>     test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_list ... ok
> 
>     test result: ok. 11 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered
>     out; finished in 2.88s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/bpftool_tests/Makefile      | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_tests/Makefile
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_tests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_tests/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0b5633cda8b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_tests/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@

I'd recommend adding a SPDX tag. I don't know how relevant this is for a
Makefile, but this would prevent to fall it under the default GPL-only
license, and keep it consistent with the rest of the test framework
you're introducing.

> +BPFTOOL := ../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool
> +
> +lint:
> +	cargo clippy --tests
> +	cargo check --tests
> +
> +# Build the tests but do not run them.
> +build-test:
> +	cargo test --no-run --offline
> +
> +# Run the tests on the host using sudo
> +test: build-test
> +	RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 BPFTOOL_PATH=$(BPFTOOL) sudo -E $(shell which cargo) test --offline
> +
> +# Run the tests in a vm. Requires danobi/vmtest.

Please provide the full URL to the repository. I'd also add a comment to
make it explicit that this is distinct from the vmtest.sh from the
selftests.

> +vmtest: build-test
> +	$(eval repo_root := $(shell git rev-parse --show-toplevel))
> +	$(eval kernel_img := $(shell make -s -C $(repo_root) image_name))
> +	vmtest -k $(repo_root)/$(kernel_img) "RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 BPFTOOL_PATH=$(BPFTOOL) cargo test"
> +
> +clean:
> +	cargo clean





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux