On 11/11/19 9:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:39:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:36:24 +0100
The cover leter is not preserved and should therefore
...
The cover letter is +ALWAYS+ preserved, we put them in the merge
commit.
Good to know; is this a netdev special? I've not seen this before.
I think it might be netdev special, and given developers are often used to
this practice on netdev, we've adopted the same for both bpf trees as well
if the cover letter contains a useful high level summary of the whole set.
We've recently changed our workflow a bit after last maintainers summit and
reuse Thomas' mb2q [0] in our small collection of scripts [1], so aside from
other useful features, for every commit under bpf/bpf-next there is now also
a 'Link:' tag pointing to https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ archive, thus cover
letter or discussions could alternatively be found this way.
One downside of merge commit as cover letter is that they are usually lost (*)
once commits get cherry-picked into stable trees or other downstream, backport
heavy kernels, so with a 'Link:' tag it's a convenient way to quickly get more
context or discussions for those cases.
Is there a convenient git command to find the merge commit for a given
regular commit? Say I've used git-blame to find a troublesome commit,
then how do I find the merge commit for it?
Once you have the sha, you could for example retrieve the corresponding
merge commit from the upstream tree (as top commit) via:
$ git log <sha>..master --ancestry-path --merges --reverse
Also, I still think this does not excuse weak individual Changelogs.
Ideally commit messages should be as self-contained as possible to have all
the necessary context w/o having to look up other resources also given issue
(*) above.
Thanks,
Daniel
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/quilttools.git/
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/pw.git/
