On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 17:41 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: [...] > I think you're trying to make it similar to is_iter_next_kfunc(), > but in this context the _iter_next is confusing. Especially _next suffix. > Maybe > s/bool callback_iter/bool calls_callback/ ? > s/is_callback_iter_next/calls_callback/ ? > s/mark_callback_iter_next/mark_calls_callback/ ? > > callback_iter_depth isn't quite accurate either. > Maybe callback_nest_level ? Makes sense, will update naming scheme.
