Re: [PATCH bpf 03/12] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:43 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 13:38 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 6:18 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch a few patches from this one changes logic for callbacks
> > > handling.
> >
> > That's a wordsmith level 10. I'm far below this level.
> > Could you please rephrase it? 'The next patch changes ...' or something?
>
> This is patch #3, and actual changes are in patch #6, I can change it to:
>
>   A follow-up patch "bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called
>   unknown number of times" changes logic for callbacks handling.
>   While previously callbacks were verified as a single function
>   call, new scheme takes into account that callbacks could be
>   executed unknown number of times.
>   ...
>
> Would that work?

... or just drop it. The commit log typically describes only what's
happening in this commit or links to prior commits.
Future commit references are unusual.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux