Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:40:41 -0800
Cc: bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5ee643a8-d39e-470b-83e9-9d550374e617@gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> PING

Sorry for the delay. I didn't have a chance to think it through.
I hope experts in the community can take a look soon.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Maciej Fijalkowski

References:
- [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Leon Hwang
- Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
  - From: Leon Hwang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf 03/12] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification scheme
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf 03/12] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification scheme
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall hierarchy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux