[PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: Update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_ macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Multiple files/programs in `tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/` still
heavily use the `CHECK` macro, even when better `ASSERT_` alternatives are
available.

As it was already pointed out by Yonghong Song [1] in the bpf selftests the use
of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro.

This patchset replaces the usage of `CHECK(` macros to the equivalent `ASSERT_`
family of macros in the following prog_tests:
- bind_perm.c
- bpf_obj_id.c
- bpf_tcp_ca.c
- vmlinux.c

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0a142924-633c-44e6-9a92-2dc019656bf2@xxxxxxxxx

Yuran Pereira (4):
  Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
  Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm
  Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id
  selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in
    vmlinux

 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bind_perm.c      |   6 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_obj_id.c     | 204 +++++++-----------
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c     |  48 ++---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/vmlinux.c        |  16 +-
 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux