On 11/10/23 11:45 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:37 AM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With latest clang18 (main branch of llvm-project repo), when building bpf selftests,
[~/work/bpf-next (master)]$ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf LLVM=1 -j
The following compilation error happens:
fatal error: error in backend: Branch target out of insn range
...
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: clang -g -Wall -Werror -D__TARGET_ARCH_x86 -mlittle-endian
-I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include
-I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf -I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/include/uapi
-I/home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/usr/include -idirafter
/home/yhs/work/llvm-project/llvm/build.18/install/lib/clang/18/include -idirafter /usr/local/include
-idirafter /usr/include -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types -DENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS -O2 --target=bpf
-c progs/pyperf180.c -mcpu=v3 -o /home/yhs/work/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/pyperf180.bpf.o
1. <eof> parser at end of file
2. Code generation
...
The compilation failure only happens to cpu=v2 and cpu=v3. cpu=v4 is okay
since cpu=v4 supports 32-bit branch target offset.
The above failure is due to upstream llvm patch [1] where some inlining behavior
are changed in clang18.
To workaround the issue, previously all 180 loop iterations are fully unrolled.
The bpf macro __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ (implemented in clang18 recently) is used to avoid
unrolling changes if cpu=v4. If __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is not available and the
compiler is clang18, the unrollng amount is unconditionally reduced.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a2e77cf9e11dbf56b5720c607313a566eebb16e
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c
index c39f559d3100..42c4a8b62e36 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf180.c
@@ -1,4 +1,26 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
// Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
#define STACK_MAX_LEN 180
+
+/* llvm upstream commit at clang18
+ * https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1a2e77cf9e11dbf56b5720c607313a566eebb16e
+ * changed inlining behavior and caused compilation failure as some branch
+ * target distance exceeded 16bit representation which is the maximum for
+ * cpu v1/v2/v3. Macro __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is later implemented in clang18
+ * to specify which cpu version is used for compilation. So a smaller
+ * unroll_count can be set if __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ is less than 4, which
+ * reduced some branch target distances and resolved the compilation failure.
+ *
+ * To capture the case where a developer/ci uses clang18 but the corresponding
+ * repo checkpoint does not have __BPF_CPU_VERSION__, a smaller unroll_count
+ * will be set as well to prevent potential compilation failures.
+ */
+#ifdef __BPF_CPU_VERSION__
+#if __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ < 4
+#define UNROLL_COUNT 90
+#endif
+#elif __clang_major__ == 18
+#define UNROLL_COUNT 90
+#endif
+
can it be written as one if?
#if (defined(__BPF_CPU_VERSION__) && __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ < 4) ||
__clang_major >= 18
?
This won't work. For example, using latest upstream clang18, __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ does exist,
and user use cpu v4, in this case we do not want to do unrolling but with the above:
(defined(__BPF_CPU_VERSION__) && __BPF_CPU_VERSION__ < 4) is false
__clang_major >= 18 is true
so we do unrolling but we do not need to do since user uses cpu v4.
#include "pyperf.h"
--
2.34.1
