On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:05 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > When I was analysing and crafting the test I for some reason assumed I > > need to have a jump inside the state that won't trigger state > > checkpoint. But I think that's not necessary, just doing conditional > > jump and jumping back an instruction or two should do. With that yes, > > TEST_STATE_FREQ should be a better way to do this. > > Ah, ok, TEST_STATE_FREQ won't work. It triggers state checkpointing > both at conditional jump instruction and on its target, because target > is prune point. > > So I think this test has to be the way it is. I see. I was about to apply it, but then noticed: numamove_bpf-numamove_bpf.o |migrate_misplaced_page |success -> failure (!!)|-100.00 % veristat is not known for sporadic failures. Is this a real issue?
