Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: replace register_is_const() with is_reg_const()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed,  8 Nov 2023 22:00:41 +0800 you wrote:
> The addition of is_reg_const() in commit 171de12646d2 ("bpf: generalize
> is_branch_taken to handle all conditional jumps in one place") has made the
> register_is_const() redundent. Give the former has more feature, plus the
> fact the latter is only used in one place, replace register_is_const() with
> is_reg_const(), and remove the definition of register_is_const.
> 
> This requires moving the definition of is_reg_const() further up. And since
> the comment of reg_const_value() reference is_reg_const(), move it up as
> well.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: replace register_is_const() with is_reg_const()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3815f89592d5

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux